Well, it’s Friday night and I am late to submit my blog (always being at 5 pm) since I procrastinated last night and have worked about a 9 hour shift today. I am having a really hard time deciding what to blog about, and so I scrolled through tumblr for inspiration. I found my inspiration, with a subtle undertone of fear.
http://techland.time.com/2012/01/12/sopa-reddit-confirms-january-18-blackout-wikipedia-and-others-may-follow/#ixzz1jHT7Nu7l
In my Asian Pacific Americans in the Media class at ASU (APA 340) we have been focusing around a common theme that there are dominant voices and there are minority voices. In terms of mainstream media the dominant voice, which in America can be embodied as the white wealthy male in a suit behind a desk in the top level of a sky scraper in a metropolis, has a powerful influence over the way we as members of society shape our views of society itself. The minority voice, which in my interpretation is the voice of the individual him/herself, has always found it difficult to manifest their vision because of inaccessibility to media.
With the rise of the traveling internet, it is common for many people to have internet but have no TV, which in many ways is the most direct and dominant form of media there is. The internet has become an alternative place for people with oppressed ideas to voice their opinions. Without the internet, Angry Asian Man would not have been able to develop an enormous following and be considered a viable source for talking about race and social hierarchy short of buying a radio station. This is true for many others as well.
The fear I spoke of earlier is the clenching grip of banning and censorship. The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) which is written to strengthen copyright laws and fight online trafficking on copyrighted goods, especially against foreign websites. Now, I get wanting to protect people from getting their ideas stolen, which does happen, but this bill threatens to shut down entire domains.
When we discussed the use of the internet to say opinions which wouldn’t normally be heard, we discussed how it is necessary for all voices to have an outlet. It is not just an outlet for those who have something good to say, but others who we may disagree with can still find people who agree with them. Although complete freedom of speech sounds like it has its drawbacks, such as people advocating hate and fear, this kind of discourse is necessary for people to have an unbiased opinion, and through the natural course of discussion, those perspectives that we relate to such as acceptance and love, will undoubtedly supersede those messages of hate. So you see, censorship is not necessary because, just as laissez-faire, the invisible hand of the economy, regulates the flow of money, the nature of discourse with keep the pool of the internet flowing.
What is the connection to SOPA? While the bill does not have anything to do with blocking free speech, the majority of this discourse that I spoke of circulates the internet. Many of the web domains that are used as a stage for discussing ethnicity, gender, government, and moral issues are found on sites such as Tumblr which is easily under the radar of SOPA. Bills like SOPA threaten the incubation chambers of our social discourse.
